Skip to main content

The text of the EU Regulation, as it is

This is the official text of the European Union Regulation EC 261/2004, the law that sets compensation of €250, €400 or €600 per passenger for a cancelled flight and for delays on flights from and to Europe. The main articles in the original English, with a short plain description of each, and the court ruling that set the 3-hour threshold.

Source of the text
EUR-Lex (the official text), CELEX 32004R0261
Text viewed on
29 August 2026
Official publication
OJ L 46, 17.2.2004
Applies in
The European Union + Iceland, Norway and Switzerland

This English version is part of the information and contractual terms given to English-speaking customers. If the Hebrew and English versions differ on fees, payments, cancellation rights or other customer rights, the English version prevails for a customer who entered into the service in English.

The Regulation in brief

European Union Regulation EC 261/2004 gives a passenger fixed compensation of €250, €400 or €600, by flight distance and whatever the ticket price, when their flight was cancelled or when they reached their final destination 3 hours or more late. The Regulation applies to every flight departing from an airport in the European Union, whatever the airline, and also to a flight landing in the EU when the operating carrier is a European airline.

The airline is exempt from the compensation only if it proves extraordinary circumstances that could not have been avoided, and the burden is on the airline. Even when the exemption applies, the passenger keeps the right to a refund of the ticket price or an alternative ticket, and the assistance services. Actual entitlement depends on the circumstances of the flight.

How to read this page

The text in English in the blue box is the official text of the Regulation, quoted from EUR-Lex. The Regulation is binding in its official languages only, and English is one of them. The grey text below it is our own description: what the article deals with, and where it differs from the Israeli Law. The description is not part of the Regulation, is not a binding interpretation and is not advice.

This page shows the main articles on compensation, refunds and assistance, not the whole Regulation. The full text: EUR-Lex.

The amounts, compared with the Israeli Law

Flight distanceEU261Israeli Law (2026)
Short band (EU: 1,500 km or less · Israel: 2,000 or less)€250₪1,530
Medium band (EU: 1,500-3,500 · Israel: 2,000-4,500)€400₪2,450
Long band (EU: more than 3,500 · Israel: more than 4,500)€600₪3,670

The big practical difference is not in the amounts but in what is measured: the Israeli Law measures the delay at departure (8 hours or more is treated as a cancellation), and the European Regulation measures the delay at arrival at the destination (3 hours or more, under the case law). So a flight that landed at Ben Gurion 4 hours late may bring no compensation under the Israeli Law and €250 under the European one, and the other way round, for a cancellation the Israeli amounts are higher. The distance bands are also different (1,500/3,500 km compared with 2,000/4,500 in the Israeli Law).

Article 3(1) · Scope: which flights the Regulation covers

This Regulation shall apply: (a) to passengers departing from an airport located in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies; (b) to passengers departing from an airport located in a third country to an airport situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies, unless they received benefits or compensation and were given assistance in that third country, if the operating air carrier of the flight concerned is a Community carrier.

Plain description: Two routes to coverage: (a) every flight departing from an airport in the EU, whatever the airline, so a flight from Athens or Paris to Ben Gurion is covered even when operated by El Al; (b) a flight departing from outside the EU to a destination inside it, only when the operating carrier is a European airline, so Ben Gurion to Paris on Air France is covered, and the same route on El Al is not. An outbound flight and a return flight are assessed as two separate flights.

Article 5(1)(c) · Cancellation: when the fixed compensation is not paid

…have the right to compensation by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 7, unless: (i) they are informed of the cancellation at least two weeks before the scheduled time of departure; or (ii) they are informed of the cancellation between two weeks and seven days before the scheduled time of departure and are offered re-routing, allowing them to depart no more than two hours before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than four hours after the scheduled time of arrival; or (iii) they are informed of the cancellation less than seven days before the scheduled time of departure and are offered re-routing, allowing them to depart no more than one hour before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than two hours after the scheduled time of arrival.

Plain description: A cancellation gives the right to the fixed compensation, unless the airline gave notice at least 14 days in advance; or gave notice 7 to 14 days in advance and offered an alternative that departs no more than 2 hours earlier and arrives less than 4 hours later; or gave notice less than 7 days in advance and offered an alternative that departs no more than 1 hour earlier and arrives less than 2 hours later. The similarity to the Israeli Law is not a coincidence: both are built on the same notice windows.

Article 5(3) · Extraordinary circumstances: the exemption and its conditions

An operating air carrier shall not be obliged to pay compensation in accordance with Article 7, if it can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.

Plain description: The only exemption from the fixed compensation: extraordinary circumstances that could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken, and the burden of proving this is on the airline. The courts have held that an ordinary technical fault and a strike by the airline's own staff are, as a rule, not extraordinary circumstances. Even when the exemption applies, it does not cancel the assistance services and the right to a refund.

Article 5(4) · Burden of proof on when notice was given

The burden of proof concerning the questions as to whether and when the passenger has been informed of the cancellation of the flight shall rest with the operating air carrier.

Plain description: If the question is whether and when notice of the cancellation was given, it is the airline that has to prove it, not the passenger. A passenger who does not remember when they received the notice does not lose the claim because of that.

Article 6(1) · Delay: the thresholds for assistance

When an operating air carrier reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure: (a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or (b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or (c) for four hours or more in the case of all flights not falling under (a) or (b), passengers shall be offered by the operating air carrier: (i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and (ii) when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and (iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).

Plain description: A departure delay of 2 hours (short flight), 3 hours (medium) or 4 hours (long) gives the right to assistance services: food and communication, and accommodation where needed. From a 5-hour delay, the right to a refund of the ticket price also opens. Please note: this article itself deals with assistance and refunds; the monetary compensation for delay was set by the courts (see the Sturgeon box on this page).

Article 7(1) · Amounts of the fixed compensation

Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall receive compensation amounting to: (a) EUR 250 for all flights of 1500 kilometres or less; (b) EUR 400 for all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres, and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; (c) EUR 600 for all flights not falling under (a) or (b). In determining the distance, the basis shall be the last destination at which the denial of boarding or cancellation will delay the passenger's arrival after the scheduled time.

Plain description: Three bands by distance: €250 (1,500 km or less), €400 (longer flights within the EU, and every other flight between 1,500 and 3,500 km), €600 (beyond that). The distance is measured in a straight line to the final destination. The amount is per passenger, whatever the ticket price, as in the structure of the Israeli Law, except that the amounts are in euros and are not linked to an index.

Article 7(2) · 50% reduction when the alternative arrived close to the original time

When passengers are offered re-routing to their final destination on an alternative flight pursuant to Article 8, the arrival time of which does not exceed the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked (a) by two hours, in respect of all flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or (b) by three hours, in respect of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or (c) by four hours, in respect of all flights not falling under (a) or (b), the operating air carrier may reduce the compensation provided for in paragraph 1 by 50 %.

Plain description: If an alternative flight was offered that arrived at the destination within 2 hours / 3 hours / 4 hours (by distance band) of the original time, the airline may reduce the compensation by half. This is the counterpart of section 6(b) of the Israeli Law.

Article 7(3) · How it is paid: money, not a forced voucher

The compensation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be paid in cash, by electronic bank transfer, bank orders or bank cheques or, with the signed agreement of the passenger, in travel vouchers and/or other services.

Plain description: The compensation is paid in money: cash, bank transfer or cheque. A travel voucher is possible only with the passenger's signed agreement; an airline may not force a voucher instead of money.

Article 8(1) · The choice between a refund and an alternative ticket

Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall be offered the choice between: (a) reimbursement within seven days, by the means provided for in Article 7(3), of the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought, for the part or parts of the journey not made, and for the part or parts already made if the flight is no longer serving any purpose in relation to the passenger's original travel plan, together with, when relevant, a return flight to the first point of departure, at the earliest opportunity; (b) re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to their final destination at the earliest opportunity; or (c) re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to their final destination at a later date at the passenger's convenience, subject to availability of seats.

Plain description: On a cancellation (and in other cases the Regulation refers to), the passenger chooses: a refund of the full ticket price within 7 days, or an alternative ticket at the earliest opportunity, or an alternative ticket at a later date that suits the passenger. This is the counterpart of the “other benefits” in section 3(a) of the Israeli Law.

Article 9(1)-(2) · Assistance services

Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall be offered free of charge: (a) meals and refreshments in a reasonable relation to the waiting time; (b) hotel accommodation in cases where a stay of one or more nights becomes necessary, or where a stay additional to that intended by the passenger becomes necessary; (c) transport between the airport and place of accommodation (hotel or other). In addition, passengers shall be offered free of charge two telephone calls, telex or fax messages, or e-mails.

Plain description: Free of charge, where the Regulation refers to this article: food and drink in reasonable relation to the waiting time, accommodation where needed, transport between the airport and the hotel, and two telephone calls or messages. These rights survive even a claim of extraordinary circumstances.

Article 12(1) · Further compensation and no double payment

This Regulation shall apply without prejudice to a passenger's rights to further compensation. The compensation granted under this Regulation may be deducted from such compensation.

Plain description: The Regulation does not take away a right to further compensation under another law, but compensation already paid under it may be deducted from that compensation. This is the basis for the rule we work by: on a flight covered by both the Israeli Law and the Regulation, we choose one route and do not claim twice for the same head of damage.

The 3-hour threshold: the Sturgeon ruling

The text of the Regulation itself gives no monetary compensation for delay, only for cancellation and denied boarding. In the Sturgeon ruling, the Court of Justice of the European Union held that passengers who reached their final destination 3 hours or more late are entitled to compensation as for a cancellation, unless extraordinary circumstances are proved. The delay is measured at arrival at the destination (when the door opens, under the Germanwings ruling C-452/13), not at departure, unlike the Israeli Law, which measures the departure. This is the big practical difference between the two laws.

C-402/07 & C-432/07 Sturgeon (19 Nov 2009); confirmed in C-581/10 & C-629/10 Nelson (23 Oct 2012)

Questions about the Regulation

Does the European Regulation apply to an El Al flight from Europe to Israel?

Yes. Under Article 3(1)(a) the Regulation applies to every passenger departing from an airport in the territory of the European Union, whatever the airline. So an El Al flight from Paris or Athens to Ben Gurion is covered by the Regulation exactly like a flight of a European airline. In the other direction, from Ben Gurion to Europe, the Regulation applies only when the operating airline is European, so an El Al flight from Ben Gurion to Paris is not covered by it.

How much compensation does the European Regulation provide?

Under Article 7(1): €250 per passenger on a flight of 1,500 km or less; €400 on a longer flight within the EU and on any other flight between 1,500 and 3,500 km; €600 on a flight of more than 3,500 km. The amount is set by the straight-line distance to the final destination and is per passenger, whatever the ticket price. On a long flight that arrived 3-4 hours late, the airline may reduce it by half, that is, to €300.

Is there compensation for delay, and which delay counts?

The text of the Regulation itself gives no monetary compensation for delay, only for cancellation and denied boarding. In the Sturgeon ruling, the Court of Justice of the European Union held that a passenger who reached their final destination 3 hours or more late is entitled to compensation as for a cancellation. What counts is the arrival at the destination, not the departure, and under the Germanwings ruling it is the moment the aircraft door opened. This is the main difference from the Israeli Law, which measures the departure delay and sets a threshold of 8 hours.

What counts as extraordinary circumstances that exempt the airline from compensation?

Under Article 5(3), the airline is exempt from the fixed compensation only if it proves extraordinary circumstances that could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken, and the whole burden is on the airline. The courts have held that a technical fault found during routine maintenance and a strike by the airline's own staff are, as a rule, not extraordinary circumstances. A general statement such as operational reasons or technical issue is not enough. Even when the exemption applies, the assistance services and the right to a refund of the ticket price remain.

Can I claim under both the Israeli Law and the European Regulation?

Both laws can apply to the same flight, but there is no double compensation for the same head of damage. Article 12(1) provides that compensation paid under the Regulation may be deducted from other compensation. In practice, you choose the route that pays more: for a cancellation the Israeli amounts are higher, and for a landing delay of 3-8 hours on a flight from Europe, the European Regulation gives compensation while the Israeli Law does not.

Can the airline give a voucher instead of money?

No, unless the passenger agreed to it in writing. Article 7(3) provides that compensation is paid in cash, by bank transfer or by cheque, and a travel voucher is possible only with the passenger's signed agreement. A passenger may refuse a voucher and ask for payment in money.

How far back can I claim under the European Regulation?

The Regulation itself does not set a limitation period; it is set by the national law of the country where the claim is filed. Among others: 2 years in Italy and the Netherlands, 3 years in Germany, and 5 years in France, Greece and Spain. The reform approved in July 2026 is expected to set a uniform filing deadline of 9 months, but it has not yet taken effect.

What is expected to change (not yet in force)

The reform of the Regulation was approved by the EU institutions during 2026. According to published reports, it keeps the 3-hour threshold for compensation for delay and the current compensation amounts (€250, €400 and €600), and sets a 9-month filing deadline for the passenger and a 30-day reply deadline for the airline. According to the same reports, it takes effect at the end of October 2027. As long as the reform is not in force, the applicable law is the text of the Regulation quoted on this page, and the page will be updated when the amended text is published and applies.

The guidelines explain how the European Commission reads the Regulation in light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (among other things: measuring the delay at arrival, extraordinary circumstances, rights on connecting flights). They are an interpretation tool and do not change the text of the Regulation.

  • Commission Notice: Interpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, OJ C 214, 15.6.2016 (2016/C 214/04)
  • Commission Notice: Interpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (update), OJ C/2024/5687, 25.9.2024

Disclaimer, errors and liability

This page is information, not advice. It quotes the text of a law and briefly explains what each article deals with. It contains no legal advice, no legal opinion, and no finding that any particular person is owed compensation. Actual entitlement depends on the circumstances of the flight, when notice was given, the alternative offered and the evidence.

The binding text is the official publication on EUR-Lex, in the official languages of the EU. The quotes were copied on the date shown above; the descriptions are ours and are not an official translation or interpretation. Before relying on them for a request, a demand or proceedings, compare them with the official text on that day.

Possible errors. There may be copying errors or inaccuracies, in good faith. E&OE. Found a mistake? Write to service@flyback.co.il and we will fix it quickly.

Updated: 29 August 2026.

Want to know which law applies to your flight?

Check eligibility now, free →

₪0 upfront · a fee only if you receive compensation · 30 seconds

Full information on compensation for a cancelled flight: the amounts, the conditions and the check against the Ben Gurion board.